KuTh Consultants (Pty) Ltd

NPO Mobile Data & Telecommunications Optimisation · Data Sheet

NPO Mobile Financial Results

Quantified savings architecture, package mix, usage evidence, result status and implementation boundary for a reseller-supplied mobile-data estate.

1 · Result classification

Five results, including one that limits the others

Scroll table sideways →

ResultClassificationInterpretation
30.7% reductionModelled / commercially pricedDirect-network equivalent packages against the quantified reseller baseline.
40.8% reductionModelled / commercially pricedUsage-led package mix, using lower and higher bundles according to observed consumption.
10.1 percentage pointsAnalytical upliftThe additional reduction attributable to right-sizing, beyond the supplier and pricing change.
Signed migration documentsContract / implementation evidenceSupports that the solution moved beyond a theoretical quote into an implementation process.
Transition disruptionImplementation evidencePrevents the modelled saving from being described as fully realised without clean post-migration billing evidence.

3 · Savings architecture

Two scenarios against the reseller baseline

Scroll table sideways →

ScenarioCost indexReductionWhat changes
Existing reseller baseline100.0—Existing package mix and reseller commercial route.
Direct carrier, equivalent packages69.330.7%Supplier route and pricing change; package sizing broadly preserved.
Direct carrier, usage right-sized59.240.8%Supplier route changes, plus lower and higher bundles selected from usage evidence.

The 84-connection baseline is the denominator for both models. A later implementation snapshot records 92 connections and a revised package population — that changed estate must not be retrofitted into the earlier calculation.

4 · Usage mismatch

Why one package size produced two opposite losses

Scroll table sideways →

Evidence pointWhat it showsCommercial implication
88.1% of baseline on 2GBPackage concentration was far greater than usage uniformity.A common standard was administratively simple and economically blunt.
Very low-use lines presentSome connections recorded little or no use across several periods.Lower tiers or controlled top-up SIMs could cut fixed recurring cost.
High-use outliers presentSome lines repeatedly exceeded the nominal allowance.A pure downgrade strategy would create avoidable top-up cost and user disruption.
Usage history available per lineDemand could be analysed before package assignment.Right-sizing could be evidence-led, rather than based on title, seniority or default package.

5 · The right-sized estate

The range widened in both directions

Scroll table sideways →

TierQuantity in modelPurpose
Controlled / top-up SIM20Very low or intermittent use; load value only when required.
500MB21Low-use lines materially below the former standard bundle.
1GB19Moderate users below the former 2GB default.
2GB15Users whose observed demand supported the former baseline level.
3GB11Users requiring more than the former common allowance.
5GB1Higher-use line.
10GB1High-use line.
20GB2Very high-use or router-type demand.

The model expanded the range materially below the old 2GB floor while retaining larger tiers for high-use connections. Right-sizing is not a downgrade exercise — 15 users stayed at 2GB and 15 moved above it.

6 · Non-price value

From monthly invoice to managed category

The operating model added a central portal carrying balances, usage history, user profiles and expenditure visibility, together with top-up control, package changes, SIM replacement, invoice access, alerts and capped usage.

That is what keeps a right-sized estate right-sized. Package assignment based on observed demand drifts as quickly as demand does, and without a mechanism to see it and change it, the estate returns to a single default package within a year or two.