Integrated Travel Management & Mobility Solutions · Data Sheet
Integrated Travel Management & Mobility — Financial Results
Operational control first; financial benefit as a measurable consequence of a better travel model.
Quantitative snapshot
The negotiated position
Scroll table sideways →
| Measure | Result | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation model | ≈17.3% | Reduction in combined worked accommodation cost base |
| Sandton hotel model | ≈28.9% | Reduction in worked hotel cost base |
| Regional land arrangements | ≈15.0% | Reduction in that component |
| Airline discount | 6% → 12% | Corporate discount doubled on one carrier |
| Domestic air | ≈12.6% | Average negotiated discount on another national carrier |
| International air | ≈11.2% | Average negotiated discount on that carrier |
| Low-cost airline | 10% | Discount negotiated on eligible fares |
| Travel categories | 3 | Air, accommodation and vehicle hire |
| Travel app design | 4 phases | Database, core app, advanced reporting, responsive and security |
Result architecture
Problem and response, by category
Scroll table sideways →
| Area | Problem addressed | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Air travel | Fragmented carrier use, weak or expired corporate terms, restrictive refunds and change costs, fare-class complexity | Corporate agreements and traffic rules reworked; discount structures improved; refund and change flexibility and account support built into the operating model |
| Accommodation | Hotel and guest-house buying distributed across regions, properties, quality levels and historic rates | Historic stays reorganised by region and area; production used to negotiate preferred rates; distance, quality and operational fit built into the preferred list |
| Vehicle hire | Multiple rate structures, mileage bands, waivers, secondary-supplier issues and avoidable no-show charges | Primary and secondary supplier logic improved; revised rates negotiated; an alternative option avoided the same no-show fee exposure |
| Workflow | Requests, quotes, approvals, bookings, confirmations, invoices and reporting not controlled through one information flow | A travel-management application specified around traveller profiles, policy, cost centres, approvals, quote comparison, fulfilment, invoices and real-time reporting |
Commercial mechanisms
Why the benefit came from several places at once
Scroll table sideways →
| Mechanism | What changed | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Airline agreements | Discount tiers broadened; changes, refunds, account support and incentive structures improved | A fare discount is one component of total trip cost; servicing flexibility materially affects realised cost |
| Airline mix / policy | Traffic-allocation rules used rather than traveller preference alone | Contracted value is realised only when eligible bookings reach the right supplier and fare class |
| Accommodation sourcing | Production history became area-level bid information and preferred rates | Negotiation based on actual demand, location and quality rather than generic hotel discounts |
| Vehicle rental | Rates, mileage, waivers, no-show fees and alternative-supplier capability considered together | Headline day rate can understate total trip cost |
| Refunds and changes | Historical refund and penalty behaviour analysed separately | Unused value and servicing costs can erode negotiated savings |
Accommodation method
Building a preferred programme from production data
Scroll table sideways →
| Control | How it was applied |
|---|---|
| Production history | Historic room-night activity showed suppliers the volume available in each area, instead of asking for generic corporate rates |
| Area logic | Demand grouped by practical travel area, allowing like-for-like location comparison |
| Quality / suitability | Star rating and quality considered, so a cheaper property was not treated as equivalent automatically |
| Distance | Properties tested for practical distance from CBDs or previously used locations |
| Preferred list | Final output included a preferred hotel list with new contracted rates by area |
| Exception logic | Where a current location or specialist need remained operationally preferable, no move was required purely to simplify the supplier base |
Interpretation
The percentages are the additional financial benefit. The principal result was a repeatable managed-travel architecture controlling demand, supplier terms, approvals, fulfilment, servicing and reporting — the capability that later became directly relevant to HerTho Travel.
Accommodation figures are worked models on a reconstructed cost base. Client and supplier identities, fare and rate schedules and negotiated contract terms are withheld.